Tuesday, March 10, 2015

Response to Context-Based Adult Learning

     In “Context-based Adult Learning,” Catherine Hansman raises some interesting questions about how we really learn to teach. Despite pedagogical training that happens in schools or professional development that is provided by educational institutions, real learning –for both teachers and students—seems to occur in the classroom as we interact with each other. Students learn from teachers, although they are more likely to learn from other students in collaborative activities; teachers learn from students as we respond to unique needs and circumstances that arise in each classroom.
     Hansman asserts the primacy of social context as a site of learning. In addition, teachers in adult classrooms must design pedagogical approaches that are specific to our learners’ needs. We must pay “attention to interaction and intersection among people, tools, and context within a learning situation” (Hansman 44).  When I think of effective pedagogies for adults, I am never comfortable applying a needs-assessment model to the classroom where the teacher determines the needs of the students than designs lessons to address those needs.
     Adults know what they need; there’s no need for teachers of adults to assess needs, rather the goals of any particular class should be ascertained in collaboration with the students in that classroom. In other words, we need to talk to our students. If we want to know what they need, we have simply to ask. If goals are determined after this fashion, context already infused into the content of the class. Students determine their needs as they encounter situations and information they are unfamiliar with understanding and producing. As teachers of adults, our real job is to help students negotiate these circumstances as they arise.